Baptisms 14 Oct 1857 for Annie Louisa Killik and her twin Louisa Annie Killik b 27 Aug 1857
However they are both registered in 1858???
KILLIK, ANNIE LOUISA RADBURN
GRO Reference: 1858 M Quarter in KENSINGTON Volume 01A Page 104
KILLIK, LOUISA ANNIE RADBURN
GRO Reference: 1858 M Quarter in KENSINGTON Volume 01A Page 104
Query 1) How can this have happened do you think?
Their parents Henry Killik and Ursula Emilie Radburn married 7 Aug 1849.
Ursula Emilie Radburn was a spinster of full age but her father is noted as Manuel Jose Nachado(??) gentleman.
1849 Marriage Henry Killik to Ursula Emilie Radburn - Nachado.jpg
Query2) Can anyone read the father's name? As a spinster her name is Radburn - perhaps her mother remarried and he is the stepfather????
Query 3) I cannot as yet find a baptism for Ursula Emilie Radburn/Nachado or an 1841 census for her. I have her on all other censuses until her death. On census her POB is given variously as Lambeth, London and Waterloo, London which is Lambeth Reg Dist. On early censuses DOB 1828 but on 1901 and 1911 given as 1831
Name is Killik but sometimes Killick/Kellick
However they are both registered in 1858???
KILLIK, ANNIE LOUISA RADBURN
GRO Reference: 1858 M Quarter in KENSINGTON Volume 01A Page 104
KILLIK, LOUISA ANNIE RADBURN
GRO Reference: 1858 M Quarter in KENSINGTON Volume 01A Page 104
Query 1) How can this have happened do you think?
Their parents Henry Killik and Ursula Emilie Radburn married 7 Aug 1849.
Ursula Emilie Radburn was a spinster of full age but her father is noted as Manuel Jose Nachado(??) gentleman.
1849 Marriage Henry Killik to Ursula Emilie Radburn - Nachado.jpg
Query2) Can anyone read the father's name? As a spinster her name is Radburn - perhaps her mother remarried and he is the stepfather????
Query 3) I cannot as yet find a baptism for Ursula Emilie Radburn/Nachado or an 1841 census for her. I have her on all other censuses until her death. On census her POB is given variously as Lambeth, London and Waterloo, London which is Lambeth Reg Dist. On early censuses DOB 1828 but on 1901 and 1911 given as 1831
Name is Killik but sometimes Killick/Kellick
Comment