re Lanham/Moyes - I have someone that seemed to have swapped from Fathers name to mothers name, and not particularly stuck with one. I did wonder whether it was just confusing as she was Jane Worth Proctor and sometimes she just called herself Jane Worth, or whether it was intentional to try and change name and confuse 'authorities'
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
FHL lookup request
Collapse
X
-
I have Charles:
Name: Charles Catchpole
Gender: Male
Baptism Date: 10 Sep 1826
Baptism Place: Bacton,Suffolk,England
Father: George Catchpole
Mother: Elizabeth Moyse
FHL Film Number: 989541
but like you not found a William, only 1871 that is the GrandchildCarolyn
Family Tree site
Researching: Luggs, Freeman - Cornwall; Dayman, Hobbs, Heard - Devon; Wilson, Miles - Northants; Brett, Everett, Clark, Allum - Herts/Essex
Also interested in Proctor, Woodruff
Comment
-
Originally posted by Katarzyna View PostThe only Thomas I can see on a census is 1851 and this has been mistranscribed - the name is Thirza. Did you have a baptism?
You are right, Thomas on the list was a transcription error that I had not corrected on the tree.
Especially when it clearly states 'daughter' (DOH! )Avatar is my Gt Grandfather
Researching:
FRANKLIN (Harrow/Pinner 1700 to 1850); PURSGLOVE (ALL Southern counties of England); POOLE (Tetbury/Malmesbury and surrounding areas of Gloucestershire and Wiltshire (1650 to 1900); READ London/Suffolk
Comment
-
Originally posted by Katarzyna View Post
We can now say that there were 11 children and not 13, with the Thomas and William I had mentioned as the two I had to double check, now confirmed as not of this family group.
TrevAvatar is my Gt Grandfather
Researching:
FRANKLIN (Harrow/Pinner 1700 to 1850); PURSGLOVE (ALL Southern counties of England); POOLE (Tetbury/Malmesbury and surrounding areas of Gloucestershire and Wiltshire (1650 to 1900); READ London/Suffolk
Comment
-
I went to order my Polish films at the LDS centre today completely forgetting that they have been unavailable since 2017 to order as they are still digitising them. Polish records won't be available for maybe a couple of years :(
However, I searched out the record you requested Trevor and it is marriage banns for Bacton. Images for Bacton Banns are to 1882 but unfortunately the marriages are only up to 1837. There are no Marriage Banns for Barham but I checked out the Barham marriages for 1860 and 1861 and the marriage isn't there.
Clark 2.jpg
The film has both Bacton and Barham records. As you can see the dates for the Banns are for Aug/Sep 1860 Bacton not Barham so I wonder is the transcriber muddled Bacton and Barham by mistake. (I had to check back and forward through the film to make sure I wasn't the one making the mistake.)
The GRO gives Sep 1861 for the marriage. Either they waited a year to marry or GRO have the wrong Year transcribed.
GRO has Hartismere as the registration district which would be correct for Bacton (Barham would be Bosmere Reg Dist )
I'm afraid the only way to check out the fathers would be to buy the certificate. Sorry I couldn't help.Kat
My avatar is my mother 1921 - 2012
Comment
-
England Marriages, 1538–1973 FHL microfilm 1658080.
Walter Farrow
Spouse's Name:
Eliza Steggall
Event Date:
24 Jun 1860
Event Place:
Barham, Suffolk, England
Their Banns were on the adjoining page to yours (Bacton) and it has been transcribed as Barham as well but they married in Hartismere too so it does look like the transcriber made a mistake.Last edited by Katarzyna; 11-01-20, 14:44.Kat
My avatar is my mother 1921 - 2012
Comment
-
A bit more proof(?)
England and Wales Census, 1851
Name:
Eliza Steggall
Event Type:
Census
Event Date:
1851
Event Place:
Bacton, Suffolk, England
Registration District:
Hartismere
Gender:
Female
Age:
11
Walter was born Bacton on censuses
It all goes to show transcriptions cannot be relied on - they are only a guideLast edited by Katarzyna; 11-01-20, 14:59.Kat
My avatar is my mother 1921 - 2012
Comment
Comment