Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Smith family lost in 1851!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Smith family lost in 1851!

    I am trying to trace this SMITH family in the 1861 & 1851 census

    1871 census:
    RG10; Piece: 3571; Folio: 59; Page: 18
    Is Eliza’s place of birth London – image not clear!
    Son William – age I think should be 24 rather than 34.

    Tracing back to 1861, the best match is:
    RG9; Piece: 2499; Folio: 113; Page: 21
    Would you agree?

    Struggling for 1851 – any suggestions!
    Elaine








  • #2
    I'd say William is definitely 24 and not 34.

    Eliza's birth place is more difficult, but it doesn't look like London
    Last edited by Georgette; 07-01-08, 15:22.

    Comment


    • #3
      The family in 1861 does look like a good match.

      Comment


      • #4
        Elaine

        1871 census:

        Is Eliza’s place of birth London – looks very much like London to me,

        Son William – age is 24
        Julie
        They're coming to take me away haha hee hee..........

        .......I find dead people

        Comment


        • #5
          and yes,

          I'd agree with the 1861 as well

          pity it doesnt give a POB for eliza though....
          Julie
          They're coming to take me away haha hee hee..........

          .......I find dead people

          Comment


          • #6
            1851???

            Class: HO107; Piece: 2067; Folio: 404; Page: 29

            in coventry... warks.
            Julie
            They're coming to take me away haha hee hee..........

            .......I find dead people

            Comment


            • #7
              and perhaps this for 41

              Source Citation: Class: HO107; Piece 199; Book: 18; Civil Parish: St Werburgh; County: Derbyshire; Enumeration District: 6; Folio: 21; Page: 37; Line: 3;

              do you have a marriage for joseph and emma Elaine??
              Julie
              They're coming to take me away haha hee hee..........

              .......I find dead people

              Comment


              • #8
                I keep coming back to that one in 1851 Julie.
                The parents fit OK but although the children's names are right, the ages are a bit muddled!

                Why do they make it so difficult! :(
                Elaine







                Comment


                • #9
                  Yes I saw the 1841 as well Julie.

                  It's not one of mine - trying to help out one of our newbies in our local genealogy group. It's difficult enough when you are a beginner but then having to trace a Smith back! The problem is it is Eliza she is interested in - and it seems odd that she has one census without a place of birth, and the other census as being born in London. In later censuses when she is married she gives place of birth as Derby. I am sure it is the right family as her marriage certificate shows father as Joseph, occupation Trimming Maker, which matches the 1861 census.
                  Elaine







                  Comment


                  • #10
                    I see what you mean,

                    i'd say thats pretty much it though, what you/me have found, trouble is there is very little Derbyshire PR's about..

                    If she was born in london, (which it does look like to me) then they moved back to derby when she was very little, she would think her POB was derby???
                    Julie
                    They're coming to take me away haha hee hee..........

                    .......I find dead people

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      How interesting, I have a Smith family missing in 1851 as well! Sadly no relation of yours!
                      ~ with love from Little Nell~
                      Chowns, Dunt, Emms, Mealing, Purvey & Smoothy

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X