Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Different surnames !!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    I wonder if this is them in 1881?
    Class: RG11; Piece: 3689; Folio: 34; Page: 24
    Tracy

    Comment


    • #22
      It's a possible - have got that one open as well!
      Elaine







      Comment


      • #23
        1861 Tinsley's

        Thomas Tinsley 39
        Mary Tinsley 34
        Thomas Tinsley 15
        Henry Tinsley 12
        Elizabeth Tinsley 8
        Robert Tinsley 7
        James Tinsley 4
        William Tinsley 4

        Living at Kirkby. Same page as some Mawdleys as it happens.
        Class: RG9; Piece: 2724; Folio: 153; Page: 25


        and again in 1871
        Thomas Tinsley 48
        Mary Tinsley 45
        Robert Tinsley 14
        James Tinsley 12
        Margaret Tinsley 10
        Jane Tinsley 6
        Mary Tinsley 6 months

        Class: RG10; Piece: 3835; Folio: 44; Page: 6

        I think Thomas is a Servant - Class: RG10; Piece: 3835; Folio: 19; Page: 6
        Last edited by Orangeblossom; 12-09-08, 14:37.
        Tracy

        Comment


        • #24
          Moving forwards from the Tinsley family in 1851, this appears to be them in 1861
          RG9; Piece: 2724; Folio: 153; Page: 25

          Interestingly they are on the same page as George and Alice Mawdesley.
          Elaine







          Comment


          • #25
            Kathlyn - what do you know about Ellen Mawdesley?
            Elaine







            Comment


            • #26
              Found Thomas and Ellen in 1901...

              Ellen Tinsley 46
              Thomas Tinsley 50
              James Tinsley 19
              Mary Tinsley 17
              Jane Tinsley 12
              Margaret Tinsley 9
              Thomas Tinsley 6
              Elizabeth Tinsley 3

              All born Kirkby, except Thomas.

              Class: RG13; Piece: 3450; Folio: 45; Page: 26
              Tracy

              Comment


              • #27
                Hi Elaine,


                Sorry for the delay in making my reply but I had to feed my owls.

                Ellen Mawdsley is my great aunt. She was born in Kirkby in 1856. Her parents are James and Ellen Mawdsley.

                Ellen had the following siblings:-

                Margaret 1849
                Mary 1851 (this is my great grandmother)
                Jane 1853
                Elizabeth 1858
                George Barlow Mawdsley 1861 (he also died in 1861)
                Possibly a James 1862.

                James, the father is shown as being a labourer/quarryman.

                I have had no end of problems with this, my paternal line. My great grandmother is Mary the sister of Ellen, and Mary married a John Roberts in 1868. (I do have this cert.) Mary`s` son John, who is my grandfather, ran away from home about 1890. To avoid detection he signed on a ship going to Australia on a two year voyage, using his mothers maiden surname of Mawdsley.

                He never disclosed this name change to any family member. He married using the name Maudesley, all his children and the ofspring of his sons, carry the name Maudesley, me included.

                It is only this reseach that has underlined various stories, that has enabled me to get the info I have to date.

                I hope that by finding children of the Mawdsley clan, I can perhaps make contact with others researching "my" family.

                The help I am receiving is so very much appreciated, I am truely grateful.

                Kathlyn
                Last edited by Kathlyn Maudesley; 12-09-08, 16:12.

                Comment


                • #28
                  Not sure if you have managed to follow what Tracy and I have come up with here! There are quite a few possibles around!

                  If you are happy that the 1891 census is the right one, then I don't think the 1881 census you found is the same family. I think there are two different family groups here and the one that you want leads back to Thomas and Mary Tinsley in 1851, with Thomas junior being shown as aged 5 (see post #18)
                  Elaine







                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X