Hi all
My brain is totally befuddled and stewed
please please would some kind soul look at these 2 entries for the 1871 census
listing is for 171 Chingford Lane, Walthamstow, Essex
James George - head - widower - 41 - carpenter - Middlesex, London *page before
John Walter George - son - 14 - employ*** Carman - Middlesex, London
Walter George- son - 11 - scholar - Middlesex, London
James Arthur George - son - 9 - scholar - Middlesex, London
Then we have
23 Roberts Place, Mile end old town, London
James George - head - widower - 39 - carpenter - Bethnal green, Middx
John Walter " - son - unmar - 15 - Carman - Stepney, Middx
William " - son - unmar - 11 - scholar - Stepney, Middx
James Arthur " - son - unmar - 9 - scholar - Stepney, Middx
(William is very often mentioned as wally/walter in other family docs)
Is this the same family or have I completely lost the plot and need to lie down or is there something glaringly obvious that I just cant see
My brain is totally befuddled and stewed
please please would some kind soul look at these 2 entries for the 1871 census
listing is for 171 Chingford Lane, Walthamstow, Essex
James George - head - widower - 41 - carpenter - Middlesex, London *page before
John Walter George - son - 14 - employ*** Carman - Middlesex, London
Walter George- son - 11 - scholar - Middlesex, London
James Arthur George - son - 9 - scholar - Middlesex, London
Then we have
23 Roberts Place, Mile end old town, London
James George - head - widower - 39 - carpenter - Bethnal green, Middx
John Walter " - son - unmar - 15 - Carman - Stepney, Middx
William " - son - unmar - 11 - scholar - Stepney, Middx
James Arthur " - son - unmar - 9 - scholar - Stepney, Middx
(William is very often mentioned as wally/walter in other family docs)
Is this the same family or have I completely lost the plot and need to lie down or is there something glaringly obvious that I just cant see
Comment