Well, I didn't want to confuse things even more,lol, but it did occur to me that it would be very easy to swap identities in the circumstances, if that was to the survivor's advantage! So the James who survived may really have been Patrick.
On the other hand it may just have been a straightforward case of a man abandoning his wife and children and starting again in the USA. He must have done, to have descendants.
I wonder what date Margaret's birth was registered because the informant already knew her father was dead. Would news have travelled that quickly in those days?
OC
On the other hand it may just have been a straightforward case of a man abandoning his wife and children and starting again in the USA. He must have done, to have descendants.
I wonder what date Margaret's birth was registered because the informant already knew her father was dead. Would news have travelled that quickly in those days?
OC
Comment