OC,
In terms of English practice then, it would be like Richardson (for example) - people with that surname don't necessarily have either to be male or to have fathers called Richard, though presumably at some point in the mists of antiquity they did have an ancestor with that name.
Thanks for gratifying my curiosity
Roger
LOL Michael
In terms of English practice then, it would be like Richardson (for example) - people with that surname don't necessarily have either to be male or to have fathers called Richard, though presumably at some point in the mists of antiquity they did have an ancestor with that name.
Thanks for gratifying my curiosity
Roger
LOL Michael
Comment