I think the answer to this is a simple one but rather than make a guess I'd appreciate your thoughts.
On this marriage register the wife was an illegitimate child, father unknown, but in this register there appear to be ditto " marks under the groom's father - implying that the bride had the same father. They are also under the spouse's occupation which made me wonder if the " marks were actually intended to signify 'none' or 'not known' Am I guessing correctly?
1885 George Crisp and Amelia Harvey marriage.JPG
The image and other details are on FMP if anyone wants to look.
On this marriage register the wife was an illegitimate child, father unknown, but in this register there appear to be ditto " marks under the groom's father - implying that the bride had the same father. They are also under the spouse's occupation which made me wonder if the " marks were actually intended to signify 'none' or 'not known' Am I guessing correctly?
1885 George Crisp and Amelia Harvey marriage.JPG
The image and other details are on FMP if anyone wants to look.
Comment