Now looking at Marylebone from whence the Irish community were said to have moved before arriving in North Ken. They lived in Cartmel EDIT Calmel Buildings around Orchard Street, Marylebone if I can find it.
Vera
And me. Store things in my head, as above, instead of writing down
Now looking at Marylebone from whence the Irish community were said to have moved before arriving in North Ken. They lived in Cartmel EDIT Calmel Buildings around Orchard Street, Marylebone if I can find it.
The first 2 were from your link Nancy Larkins with John and Ellen, then found the next lot looking for Nancy. These are as Vera says in a different part of Kensington
All the census are for Westminster not Kensington although that doesn't mean they are not potential for Ann b 1842 The addresses are in the St James area fairly close to the Wellington Barracks.
The first 2 were from your link Nancy Larkins with John and Ellen, then found the next lot looking for Nancy. These are as Vera says in a different part of Kensington
the affiliate line number is not the page number then - I have never searched on there - you need to click the document information and the page number comes up. - who knew!
why??? what a cockeyed way of going through it!.. blooming stupid if you ask me!
the affiliate line number is not the page number then - I have never searched on there - you need to click the document information and the page number comes up. - who knew!
Discover your family history. Explore the world’s largest collection of free family trees, genealogy records and resources.
the affiliate line number is not the page number then - I have never searched on there - you need to click the document information and the page number comes up. - who knew!
Oops I forgot that the other children were baptised RC.
I do wonder if William and Ann were together after the 1st marriage - Katie b in the w/house, Ann living in an area with poor conditions, with 2 children. I don't suppose you'll ever know if they were or weren't I
The 1871 has Katie b London, the 1881 Bayswater although I did chase a baptism of a Katie Larkin in ?Hants father William, mother Ann.
Vera
yes I see what you are saying but what if she thought she was born there? ie raised there for a little while and didn't know any different? I guess I'm just grabbing at straws...... badly!
I have no idea about communion records.
No, she married in a Reg office, no clue either who witness' are. [Richard Foster & Sophia Leivers]
I don't know/think that with William not being RC it would make much of a difference tbf Ann seemed to just do as she fancied anyway as can be seen in other RC baptisms. Even Adaline and William Henry were RC bapt.. the only one I haven't found a bapt for is John. [but I do have his b/c 1879]
Oops I forgot that the other children were baptised RC.
I do wonder if William and Ann were together after the 1st marriage - Katie b in the w/house, Ann living in an area with poor conditions, with 2 children. I don't suppose you'll ever know if they were or weren't I
The 1871 has Katie b London, the 1881 Bayswater although I did chase a baptism of a Katie Larkin in ?Hants father William, mother Ann.
Are there any Communion records for Notts? She would have had to be baptised before that. Did Katie marry in Church? Could be as William not RC Ann didn't bother. William may have been expected to be involved and refused.
Ann was living in Virginia Place at the time of Adeline's baptism. I can just
see it on the 1871. Seems to be only 1 house or maybe two off St James Place. Poor conditions there for a Soldier's wife even though they got little pay. During my walkabout never saw a serving Soldier or wife of a Soldier.
Vera
I have no idea about communion records.
No, she married in a Reg office, no clue either who witness' are. [Richard Foster & Sophia Leivers]
I don't know/think that with William not being RC it would make much of a difference tbf Ann seemed to just do as she fancied anyway as can be seen in other RC baptisms. Even Adaline and William Henry were RC bapt.. the only one I haven't found a bapt for is John. [but I do have his b/c 1879]
Leave a comment: