I received today the birth certificate of one of hubbys relatives. It gives the mothers maiden name as Emma Fifield who married John Hayden/Heyden. I did a quick search on Ancestry and found a marriage in 1853. It gives the following info:
Name: Emma Fifield
Gender: Female
Father's Name: William Fifield
Spouse's Name: John Heyden
Spouse's Father's Name: Stephen Heyden
Marriage Date: 11 Sep 1853
Marriage Place: Bristol, Gloucestershire, England.
I know from the 1861 census that Emma was born in Wootten-under-edge, Gloucestershire in 1834. I found Emma on the 1841 census living with just a Robert Fifield:
on the 1851 census, she is living with a Thomas Fifield and listed as sister
The only William Fifield that is old enough to be her father is the famous painter William Fifield, she is not on either census with him though. He dies in 1857. There is a William Fifield who dies in 1845 and am wondering if this is her father. having searched the 1841 census though there are only two William Fifields and one is born in 1839 so cannot be Emmas father. is it this one that dies in 1845? Also am wondering that just because Emma was born in gloucestershire was her father?! It seems to be a common name in Oxfordshire.
Am now wondering if the marriage record on ancestry is wrong, several people on ancestry have her father down as Robert who she is with in 1841.
I think I have no choice but to send off for the marriage cert and see what it says for father, whether it be Robert, William deceased, or William occupation very famous painter!!
I have been at this all afternoon and am fed up with going around in circles!
The other side Hayden behaved beautifully all appearing on the census as they should and even turning up 10 years on living with a married daughter and her family so saved loads of time there LOL
Name: Emma Fifield
Gender: Female
Father's Name: William Fifield
Spouse's Name: John Heyden
Spouse's Father's Name: Stephen Heyden
Marriage Date: 11 Sep 1853
Marriage Place: Bristol, Gloucestershire, England.
I know from the 1861 census that Emma was born in Wootten-under-edge, Gloucestershire in 1834. I found Emma on the 1841 census living with just a Robert Fifield:
on the 1851 census, she is living with a Thomas Fifield and listed as sister
The only William Fifield that is old enough to be her father is the famous painter William Fifield, she is not on either census with him though. He dies in 1857. There is a William Fifield who dies in 1845 and am wondering if this is her father. having searched the 1841 census though there are only two William Fifields and one is born in 1839 so cannot be Emmas father. is it this one that dies in 1845? Also am wondering that just because Emma was born in gloucestershire was her father?! It seems to be a common name in Oxfordshire.
Am now wondering if the marriage record on ancestry is wrong, several people on ancestry have her father down as Robert who she is with in 1841.
I think I have no choice but to send off for the marriage cert and see what it says for father, whether it be Robert, William deceased, or William occupation very famous painter!!
I have been at this all afternoon and am fed up with going around in circles!
The other side Hayden behaved beautifully all appearing on the census as they should and even turning up 10 years on living with a married daughter and her family so saved loads of time there LOL
Comment