Just digging deeper into my earlier query- In 1881 I have the family with a son called Herbert (named after the father) aged 4, 10 years later I have them with a son Herbert- aged 4, and he's in the correct descending chronological place on the census. Do you think it's a census error- a possible mishearing of 14, or was it really possible after the death of a child to name a new one after them?
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Common to have a "replacement" son?
Collapse
X
-
I have several instances where children have been named after their dead siblings, so not uncommon. You could try looking for a birth for the "new" Herbert or a death for the one who appears in 1881. Have you found Herbert in 1901?Jenny
-
Yes, very common, for boy or girl. I, too, have several, not even necessarily a parent's or grandparent's name.
I was confused, too, with the reversing of names, i.e., first child Edward George - who died - and the next boy, George Edward. Dad was Edward, maternal grandfather was George.
And later there was another Edward!Last edited by PhotoFamily; 11-05-12, 03:05.
Comment
-
Ah names!! Of little or no use in the victorian era! lol. Herbert Bloomfield James Green- known as Bloomfield in 1841 and 1851, then a steady usage of Herbert up until 1891, decides that in 1901 he wants to be called George!
Comment
-
Scrap that earlier comment, Herbert Goodwin Green 5 dies 1882 - replacement Herbert Goodwin Green Born 1887, both Tynemouth. Goodwin is also the middle name of Herbert Sr's grandfather (and I assume other family menbers too).
Comment
-
Originally posted by Konovolov View PostScrap that earlier comment, Herbert Goodwin Green 5 dies 1882 - replacement Herbert Goodwin Green Born 1887, both Tynemouth. Goodwin is also the middle name of Herbert Sr's grandfather (and I assume other family menbers too).
Margaret
Comment
-
In the 1850s one of my Joseph Dixon family had 11 children, all lived to be adults except the 2 boys named Edwin who died age d 3 and 4.. Perhaps in homage one of the cildren named Joseph named one of his 4 children Edwin and he died in infancy.. the others lived to be adults.
The name Edwin does not appear again....
Comment
-
I too have had lots of replacement children! I do not understand how they could call a second child the same name as the one who had died, to me it is like putting the mockers on the poor child! I agree that the goodwin is probably a maiden name somewhere down the track, again i have had this lot in my tree and most recently in my husbands tree, generations were called Walter Thorne Tarrant, it was only when I got right the way back the the late 1700's I found a John Tarrant whose wife mothers name was Mary ThorneKAREN xx
Comment
-
I had that when I was looking for my Grandma's birth certificate. The first one I ordered came back with birth date in June. She lived with us all her life so I knew it was 31st May.
When I delved further I saw that Great Grandma lost a child to measles at 16 months named Rosetta and when Grandma was born 5 months later she was called Rosetta
Linda
Comment
-
Great-grandfather's name was John as was his older brother (about two years older than him); possibly the elder John was poorly and they thought name the next one just in case. The older brother did die young.
Another instance was when a William was born and died, then the next was named William, etc, etc etc and eventually one named William survived.Joy
Comment
-
Originally posted by Olde Crone Holden View PostThere was superstition involved too - it was thought that the Devil, having already taken one child called Samuel, or whatever, would miss another one called Samuel and that one would survive.
OCKAREN xx
Comment
Comment