Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

1861 census ?? people missing

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 1861 census ?? people missing

    I know there are certain issues with some of the census records missing ,but I seem to have an awful lot of people I cannot find in 1861 ?
    Is there something I dont know ?

  • #2
    lol think we are all in the same boat.

    Jan x

    Comment


    • #3
      really ? I know some areas are missing but this is madness.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Val wish Id never started View Post
        really ? I know some areas are missing but this is madness.
        Have you looked at the lists of missing Pieces to see if they affect the areas relevant to your research?

        The FMP Knowledge Base has a list here (for all the censuses up to 1901): http://www.findmypast.co.uk/help-and...s/known-issues

        Christine
        Researching: BENNETT (Leics/Birmingham-ish) - incl. Leonard BENNETT in Detroit & Florida ; WARR/WOR, STRATFORD & GARDNER/GARNAR (Oxon); CHRISTMAS, RUSSELL, PAFOOT/PAFFORD (Hants); BIGWOOD, HAYLER/HAILOR (Sussex); LANCASTER (Beds, Berks, Wilts) - plus - COCKS (Spitalfields, Liverpool, Plymouth); RUSE/ROWSE, TREMEER, WADLIN(G)/WADLETON (Devonport, E Cornwall); GOULD (S Devon); CHAPMAN, HALL/HOLE, HORN (N Devon); BARRON, SCANTLEBURY (Mevagissey)...

        Comment


        • #5
          thanks Christine will have a look at that

          Comment


          • #6
            well St Pancras in 1861 isn't on that list for a start ??? maybe I should search on Ancestry, thanks Christine.
            Last edited by Guest; 09-05-12, 00:21.

            Comment


            • #7
              a lot of london is missing.....wich is a complete bummer, i may have been able to solve a mystery if it existed for st george hanover square!

              Comment


              • #8
                according to the list St Pancras isn't missing ? so I must be doing something wrong Kyle ? had enough for today going to bed nitex

                Comment


                • #9
                  Hi Val, I have a lot of trouble lately with mistranscriptions on ancestry! ir Korney instead of Rooney and yesterday Cains instead of Cearns! Not admittedly for the 1861 in particular but just in general, have you tried doing a wildcard search? Post away if you would like a second pair of eyes
                  KAREN xx

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    I tried not using their surname not using their first name etc Karen , they could be in the Pancras Workhouse.
                    Good of you to offer these are some of them
                    Take your pick

                    All Surnamed
                    STANTON

                    1861
                    Mother Harriett born 1815 Haringey
                    Daughter Harriett born 1846 Camden
                    Daughter Mary born 1847 Camden

                    1851
                    Son George born 1836 Haringey

                    1871
                    Daughter Ann born 1840 Whitechapel

                    I dont think they will be together somehow as some of them they are in Pancras Workhouse in 1851 and get baptised there and Harriett the Mother dies in 1868 .
                    Should have said George her Husband who was also in the Workhouse in 1851 dies in 1852 in Pancras and is buried in Camden.

                    If you can find just one would be grateful thanks dont worry about any other records this will do fine for now
                    Thanks
                    Last edited by Guest; 09-05-12, 14:26.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Hiya Val, just seen your list and will get looking BUT bit confused you have three under the 1861?! I thought this was the census you couldn't find them, did you mean first three together in 1851?
                      KAREN xx

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        sorry I am looking for all three in 1861 Harriett and her two Daughters Mary and Harriett anywhere?

                        George in 1851

                        and Ann in 1871
                        but not neccessarily together
                        Does that make sense?

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Yep makes sense Val, will get looking!
                          KAREN xx

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            dont worry too much and thanks Karen

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Hi Val,

                              Have got free trial on the genealogist so had a look on there.

                              was mary just plain mary or could she have been mary ann?

                              found this having had no luck on ancestry!!

                              Mary Ann Stanton
                              . . . Age : 15 ... Born in : 1846 ...
                              . . . Relation to the head of household: Servant ...
                              . . . Profession: General Servant ... Birth county : Middlesex ... Birth parish: London ... Parish: Marylebone ...
                              . . . Address: 16 Little Titchfield Street ... District: Rg9-068 ... Area: Marylebone ...
                              KAREN xx

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                or this one...less likely...........Mary Ann Stanton
                                . . . Age : 14 ... Born in : 1847 ...
                                . . . Relation to the head of household: Boarder ...
                                . . . Profession: Pupil Teacher ... Birth county : Middlesex ... Birth parish: London ... Parish: Godalming ...
                                . . . Address: Mational School ... District: Rg9_429 ... Area: Guildford ...




                                Surrey 1861
                                KAREN xx

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  A possible for Harriet b1846.........Gives birthplace as St pancras

                                  Harriett J Stinton
                                  . . . Age : 13 ... Born in : 1848 ...
                                  . . . Relation to the head of household: Servant ...
                                  . . . Profession: General Servant ... Birth county : Middlesex ... Birth parish: St Pancras ... Parish: Paddington ...
                                  . . . Address: 219 Maida Rale ... District: Rg9-005 ... Area: Kensington ...

                                  all so far for the 1861
                                  Last edited by Fuzzy; 09-05-12, 15:17.
                                  KAREN xx

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    on the 1851 the only George I can find that is remotely possible is this one BUT he gives his place of birth at St Saviours Surrey, so highly unlikely.

                                    George Stanton
                                    . . . Age : 16 ... Born in : 1835 ...
                                    . . . Relation to the head of household: Servant ...
                                    . . . Profession: Shop Boy ... Birth county : Surrey ... Birth parish: St Saviours ... Parish: St Luke ...
                                    . . . Address: 46 Bath Street ... District: H1071521 ... Area: Middlesex ...

                                    Had no luck with Harriett senior.

                                    Couldn't find a even a possible for Ann in 1871, but she could be married by then.
                                    KAREN xx

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      Originally posted by Fuzzy View Post
                                      A possible for Harriet b1846.........Gives birthplace as St pancras

                                      Harriett J Stinton
                                      . . . Age : 13 ... Born in : 1848 ...
                                      . . . Relation to the head of household: Servant ...
                                      . . . Profession: General Servant ... Birth county : Middlesex ... Birth parish: St Pancras ... Parish: Paddington ...
                                      . . . Address: 219 Maida Rale ... District: Rg9-005 ... Area: Kensington ...

                                      all so far for the 1861
                                      ooh you could be right about this one Karen cannot find a Birth for her thanks very much for looking , now off to see if the others are right .

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        this is also probably my George he does give his birth place as Bermondsey which is in Surrey on 1861 and he is a Poulterer ? so could have started as a shop boy

                                        thanks very much once again

                                        Originally posted by Fuzzy View Post
                                        on the 1851 the only George I can find that is remotely possible is this one BUT he gives his place of birth at St Saviours Surrey, so highly unlikely.

                                        George Stanton
                                        . . . Age : 16 ... Born in : 1835 ...
                                        . . . Relation to the head of household: Servant ...
                                        . . . Profession: Shop Boy ... Birth county : Surrey ... Birth parish: St Saviours ... Parish: St Luke ...
                                        . . . Address: 46 Bath Street ... District: H1071521 ... Area: Middlesex ...

                                        Had no luck with Harriett senior.

                                        Couldn't find a even a possible for Ann in 1871, but she could be married by then.

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X