Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

index image help please

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • index image help please

    im trying to find a death for jane ingle, b.1836 pimlico. she married henry john dimmick. i cant see her in 1901, so i was looking for a death. the only one that could fit is in kingston in 1905, but the age isnt transcribed, and i cant read it on the original.

    the ref is: jane dimmick, mar 1905, kingston. volume 2a, page 264

    can anyone read her age?

  • #2
    Originally posted by kylejustin View Post
    im trying to find a death for jane ingle, b.1836 pimlico. she married henry john dimmick. i cant see her in 1901, so i was looking for a death. the only one that could fit is in kingston in 1905, but the age isnt transcribed, and i cant read it on the original.

    the ref is: jane dimmick, mar 1905, kingston. volume 2a, page 264

    can anyone read her age?
    Hi Kyle, I'd say her age was 59 with regard to your above reference. That would put her born c1846, 10 years later than your Pimlico birth date.

    When did you last see her (1891?)? Where was she living? Could she have been mistranscribed as Dimmock?

    Comment


    • #3
      last seen in battersea, wandsworth in 1891. her husband died in chelsea in 1897 from what i can see. she was very flexible about her age.

      1891- rg 12, piece 439, folio 119, page 22 age 48
      1881- rg 11, piece 82, folio 112, page 41 age 38
      1871- rg 10, piece 705, folio 97, page 66 age 34

      marriage 3 sep 1863, st luke, chelsea, age 27

      i cant find her in 1861, and 1841. in 1851 she 17,and with her parents in st george hanover square. george ingle and sarah. st george is missing in 1841 and 1861 though.

      Comment


      • #4
        Hi - could this be her? Dec quarter, 1899

        Dimick Jane 57 Paddington
        1a 5
        Last edited by naomiatt; 10-10-09, 10:09.

        Comment


        • #5
          What about this one in the 1901 census

          RG13; Piece: 471; Folio: 88; Page: 10.
          - Ancestry.co.uk
          Elaine







          Comment


          • #6
            thank you both for that. im not sure which one she could be? most likely the one in streatham. hmmm. shes definently very difficult!

            Comment

            Working...
            X