Snozwell/Snoswell Family Help Please

[tessie31082]

Hi, OC helped me with one query last night and now I am stuck with another of my snozwell's. I thought this would be easy as its not such a common name but now I am not so sure! And I know this won't be the only one!
I am trying to find Michael/George Snozwell on the 1891 census. I have done my best and can't find a death or a marriage, can someone have a second look please? Thanks very much
Tessie

[Esta in Bristol]

Do you have rough idea of when he might have been born ?

[tessie31082]

Sorry- 1868 Donnington, Berkshire

[Jeanette In Yorkshire]

Hi Tessie

Is this him in 1871?

Edward Snosell 23
Emily Snosell 25
Michael George Snosell 3
Charles Elis Snosell 3 months
RG10; Piece: 1252; Folio: 95; Page: 1

[Jeanette In Yorkshire]

Well, it's a fabulous name :D but I can't see him anywhere

[tessie31082]

yes with his parents, but i can't see him in 1891, nor at the moment one of his sisters, they are probably mis-transcribed somewhere, but I can't see them anywhere!
Tessie

[tessie31082]

Yes thats what I thought Jeanette, not common- easy, but no hard as every other of my families!
Tessie

[Christine in Herts]

If Jeanette's right, then this is his family (without him) in 1891:
RG12; Piece: 983; Folio 22; Page 4

Christine

[Christine in Herts]

yes with his parents, but i can't see him in 1891, nor at the moment one of his sisters, they are probably mis-transcribed somewhere, but I can't see them anywhere!
Tessie

If it's Jane you're looking for, I've just put in a correction for a Jane Snos/zwell...

I'll try to work out where she was!

Christine

EDIT: At the moment, until my correction 'takes', you'll have to search under SROZWELL, even tho' the second letter is clearly an 'n'!

[Jeanette In Yorkshire]

It looks like Michael could have been born before his parents married

Marriages Dec 1868
Harris Emily Ann Newbury 2c 477
Snoswell Edward Newbury 2c 477


Births Dec 1868
HARRIS Michael George Newbury 2c 235

[tessie31082]

Yes, no michael/george anywhere, I have no jane for 1891 but I have her married in 1901. Thatsas far as I have got at the moment with this particular branch- there are lots of children!
Tessie

[tessie31082]

Oh Jeanette, can't thank you enough! Couldn't find a birth reg for him, thought I was going mad, I'll remember that one!
Tessie

[tessie31082]

oh i never thought about a mis-spelling with an R!! You are amazing people on here, thanks so much!!!
Tessie

[tessie31082]

Well, there is a James George Harris married on the 1891 born Berkshire living in Newbury, which is just down the road from where Michael/George was born, is this hi do you think?
Tessie

[Christine in Herts]

oh i never thought about a mis-spelling with an R!! You are amazing people on here, thanks so much!!!
Tessie

I was looking for SNO*L - or something like that - so it picked it up.

Unfortunately you have to have at least three live characters before a wildcard on Ancestry, or it won't work.

Christine

[tessie31082]

is the 1911 fully transcribed, because I can't find any of my snozwell boys (with the different spellings tried) on it at all?!
Tessie

[Christine in Herts]

I put in
Born in: Donnington
Names starting with: SNOS
and got nothing
Names starting with: SNOZ
and got 2 in Wantage: Edward 60, and a male "Elizah" - presumably, "Elijah", 34
(but none, if I change that from Donnington to Berkshire!)

SNOS with Berkshire gets Arthur SNOSHILL, 21, in Witney, Oxon.

Christine
- and they reckon they have transcribed the lot - tho it's clearly not error-free (see above!)

[Christine in Herts]

SNOZ... / BRIGHTWALTHAM gets WINIFRED, aged 9.

S.../ with Winifred SNOZWELL as other in the household, living in Wantage gets Edward 60 and Emily 62 plus Edward 23


Christine

[Christine in Herts]

Have you got them in 1901, so you can see a trend (if there is one)?

Christine

[tessie31082]

yes thanks!