Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Male death, aged 1 minute

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Male death, aged 1 minute

    Quite by chance I discovered a great uncle that nearly was......... this poor little chap was born prematurely in 1877 and I am wondering whether he was actually stillborn, or whether he was indeed breathing when born but died immediately afterwards.
    I know that it was common practice for nurses and doctors to quietly put "unfeasible" babies to one side and let nature take it's course, so wonder if this was the case here.

    The only thing on the certificate was "premature birth" and under the age column was "one minute".

    Any thoughts please
    Sally - Researching amongst others, JOSEPHY; WRIGHTSON; COOPER; GLOVER; DOWNING AND DICKINSON.

  • #2
    A birth and death certificate were only issued if the baby was born alive, even if it died soon after (as the case appears to be here). If the baby had been still born then a still birth certificate would have been issued so that the baby could be buried.

    So, it would seem as though he was born, but died soon after. I have a premature babies death certificate when he was 31 hours old - his cause of death is "premature birth and convulsions".

    Remembering: Cuthbert Gregory 1889 - 1916, George Arnold Connelly 1886 - 1917, Thomas Lowe Davenport 1890 - 1917, Roland Davenport Farmer 1885 - 1916, William Davenport Sheffield 1879 - 1915, Cuthbert Gregory 1918 - 1944

    Comment


    • #3
      Thank you Tom - that has helped.
      Sally - Researching amongst others, JOSEPHY; WRIGHTSON; COOPER; GLOVER; DOWNING AND DICKINSON.

      Comment


      • #4
        My friend's mother gave birth to twins - according to the baptism register, one was a stillbirth and the other baby lived for half an hour. It was a home birth and the live child was baptised by the doctor.
        There is a birth and death registration for this little girl and she was buried in the village churchyard.

        Jay
        Janet in Yorkshire



        Genealogists never die - they just swap places in the family tree

        Comment


        • #5
          Stillbirths weren't registered until 1927 on a separate register.

          My husband had an elder brother who died aged 2 minutes. He wasn't premature, but born as the result of an emergency caesarian (the handling of the labour was appalling and nowadays would result in people being sued). The cause of death was failure to breathe.
          ~ with love from Little Nell~
          Chowns, Dunt, Emms, Mealing, Purvey & Smoothy

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Little Nell View Post
            Stillbirths weren't registered until 1927 on a separate register.

            My husband had an elder brother who died aged 2 minutes. He wasn't premature, but born as the result of an emergency caesarian (the handling of the labour was appalling and nowadays would result in people being sued). The cause of death was failure to breathe.
            You still needed to get a certificate of still birth in order to be able to bury the still born baby. (At least I think you did)

            Remembering: Cuthbert Gregory 1889 - 1916, George Arnold Connelly 1886 - 1917, Thomas Lowe Davenport 1890 - 1917, Roland Davenport Farmer 1885 - 1916, William Davenport Sheffield 1879 - 1915, Cuthbert Gregory 1918 - 1944

            Comment


            • #7
              See Mary from Italy's article in the magazine:

              The Death of Baby Gordon

              Remembering: Cuthbert Gregory 1889 - 1916, George Arnold Connelly 1886 - 1917, Thomas Lowe Davenport 1890 - 1917, Roland Davenport Farmer 1885 - 1916, William Davenport Sheffield 1879 - 1915, Cuthbert Gregory 1918 - 1944

              Comment


              • #8
                My grandfather had a sister who was born in Glasgow in 1897 (his father was in the Royal Navy and they lived there for a while).

                I remember my great-aunt very well. My mum said that she was a twin, with a brother, but he didn't survive. My great-aunt had talked about it.

                However, I found her birth registration, and there was no other Purkis registered.

                I recently found the family on the 1911 census - for the number of children alive was entered 3 and the number of children born alive was 3. No mention of the little lad at all, so he must have been stillborn.

                How sad that there is no record of this little chap at all. The family remembered him and talked of him, but it was if he had never existed.
                Elizabeth
                Research Interests:
                England:Purkis, Stilwell, Quintrell, White (Surrey - Guildford), Jeffcoat, Bond, Alexander, Lamb, Newton (Lincolnshire, Stalybridge, London)
                Scotland:Richardson (Banffshire), Wishart (Kincardineshire), Johnston (Kincardineshire)

                Comment


                • #9
                  It is sad. One of the reasons I like family history is that it gives recognition to ALL those we know of and not just those who survived to adulthood. When there is no certificate we only have family memories to remember them by.

                  Anne

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X