Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Portrait of a relative - but which generation ?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Portrait of a relative - but which generation ?

    I wonder if anyone would like to hazzard a guess at when this painting was done. We think it was of a relative born about 1795 but it might be the generation before or the one after. Any clues in the picture ?

    How old do you think he is ?



    Simon

    "You've got to ask yourself one question. Do I feel lucky ? " (Dirty Harry) - Be lucky; the facts are out there somewhere

    http://www.thebirdtree.co.uk

  • #2
    I'd say it fits late 1820's maybe 1830's.

    Comment


    • #3
      I misread your post and thought you were saying you thought the picture was painted about 1795. I thought to myself that it was more likely to be around 1830ish. Now I realise that's what you were thinking too!! I would put the man at about 40 years, but he could be younger. Of course he could be older but the painter flattered him!!

      Comment


      • #4
        Yes, it's really a question of whether this was the relative born in 1795 or one from the previous generation who I haven't yet traced - born say 1775.

        If the painting is of a man about 40 years old and he is dressed in clothes consistent with the 1830 - 1840 period then it is almost certainly the relative born in 1795. However, if he is 50 years old and wearing a costume from the 1820 - 1830 period, it could be my known relatives father.

        I obviously want it to be the one born in 1795, as I can put a name to him, but I thought I would post it here to see if I was totally wrong about the clothing by asking my fellow detectives.
        Simon

        "You've got to ask yourself one question. Do I feel lucky ? " (Dirty Harry) - Be lucky; the facts are out there somewhere

        http://www.thebirdtree.co.uk

        Comment


        • #5
          Hi Simon

          I think Richard is spot on, take a look at this portrait from 1825 ;

          Image:Francesco Hayez 043.jpg - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

          I would say he would be in his late 30's maybe early 40's as his hair is still very full & shows no sign of receding.

          If the picture was painted circa 1815 then that would make it more likely to be the chap born in 1775.

          Last edited by Joan of Archives; 06-11-08, 21:29.

          Joanie

          Comment


          • #6
            The trouble is, just because a painiting is in your family doesn't make it a direct line relative, neither does it make it a relative at all necessarily!

            I have a portrait of a young woman circa 1800. I'm as sure as I can be it was purchesed because my 3xg-grandmother or her OH liked it rather than them owning it because it was one of their relations. :(

            Comment


            • #7
              Simon -Just to add fuel to Merry's fire

              Until recently I had a gallery and consulted on interior decor - mainly for businesses - one very smart restaurater opened in an old country house asked us to find (any old) portrait paintings (his words) - to make it look like they were the ancestors/original owners - which we did.
              Dorothy G

              searching Gillett (Preston/Sheffield). Campbell and Hepburn in Glasgow

              There's no such thing as a Free Lunch

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Merry Monty Montgomery View Post
                The trouble is, just because a painiting is in your family doesn't make it a direct line relative, neither does it make it a relative at all necessarily!:(
                Yes. the thought had crossed my mind but this painting has passed through the family to my fathers brother and he is pretty certain it is a THOMAS COLE born 1795.

                However I have a doubt over this as on his daughters marriage certificate in 1841 he is described as a "carrier" - which I understand is a driver of horse-drawn vehicles for transporting goods. The person in the painting looks like a land owner to me with a few bob rather than a worker. This leads me to think it might be his father although I haven't found any details about him yet. This would mean a birth around 1775 and a painting of around 1820 at the earliest .... trouble is he looks younger than 45.

                Thanks to everyone for their comments.
                Simon

                "You've got to ask yourself one question. Do I feel lucky ? " (Dirty Harry) - Be lucky; the facts are out there somewhere

                http://www.thebirdtree.co.uk

                Comment


                • #9
                  Do you know who had the painting cleaned, restored and reframed Simon? I tend to agree with Merry and Dorothy that it's been bought in. Passed down through the generations the painting would eventually have had a film of wood/coal smoke on the canvas. The gilding on the frame would, over years of polishing by servants, have been burnished away on the high spots revealing the gesso underneath which would've been coated with a terracotta wash before the gilding was applied.


                  La plus perdue de toutes les journees est celle ou l'on n'a pas ri
                  Chamfort

                  The most completely wasted of all days are those on which we have not laughed

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Actually Simon I would say the painting is more like 1820 at the LATEST so it would more likely be the chap born c 1775, & I agree he looks more like a landowner, someone of wealth.


                    Joanie

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Joan beat me to it - from the fashion I'd say much nearer 1820 than 1830. the high shirt collar was a Regency fashion (1811 to 1820) and some of the younger gentlemen too it to extremes. I would imagine a more mature gentleman such as this may well follow the fashion but not to idiocy. Also the sideburns are very reminiscent of a young Prinny or Wellington around the time of Waterloo, so I would actually guestimate this as somewhere between 1815 and 1820. Given the gentleman's age, then a birth date of around 1775-80 sounds more plausible to me

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X