Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Check for Louisa Caley

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Check for Louisa Caley

    I have searched both 1901 census online and ancestry for Louisa Caley.
    1901 census online finds 5 possible and ancestry finds 9

    Louisa was born in Lerwick 1868. However the 1881 census reports
    shetland Islands as Warwickshire. I last saw her on the 1891 cenus
    living with the her parents Joseph and Louisa in Louth Lincolnshire.
    She is has no occupation.

    I know she is alive and possibly unmarried in 1905 as she is a witness to her
    sisters wedding in Clacton-on-Sea. The certificate shows Louisa E Caley.

    I found on ancestry a Louisa E Caley, born in 1860 in Warwickshire, living
    in Stafford. Household schedule number 136

    I know Warwickshire is not in Scotland, but I'm wondering if the enumerator
    put down the same as mentioned in 1881 census - I know I'm clutching at
    straws

    I wondered if sks called check the record and see if she is living on her own,
    or possibly it's not my Louisa and she has married a Caley.

    Clare

  • #2
    be careful - there is a Louisa Carey born abt 1859 in Warwickshire- could easily have been mistranscribed.

    in the 1881 census, where she as some high falutin' school in Lancs, its says Lerwick, not warwickshire.

    * lot of them, weren't there?*
    Last edited by Jessbowbag; 31-08-08, 15:05.
    Jess

    Comment


    • #3
      I see what you mean, might not be my Louisa in 1881 :(

      Her brother John in 1881 census was at Woodhouse Grove, Rawdon, York

      Clare

      Comment


      • #4
        found her parents and some siblings in 1901 census but still no louisa e caley!

        Comment


        • #5
          I'm wondering, if she was either in another country, chose not to be included in the census, or she may have been married and then divorced, which is why she is Louisa E Caley on her sisters marriage certificate.

          Clare

          Comment


          • #6
            I think divorce in those days was really only practical for the very rich and I think most divorced women would retain their previous husband's name.

            More likely she's been mistranscribed.
            ~ with love from Little Nell~
            Chowns, Dunt, Emms, Mealing, Purvey & Smoothy

            Comment


            • #7
              Yep that seems logical as my hurdells have been mistranscribed Kendall
              and Hardell

              Just wish I could find her :(

              I was thinking I might find some info by looking at the newspapers regarding
              her sisters wedding, which may say where Louisa lived. I think it's a trip to the
              Vestry in Walthamstow which has newspapers from that era, or possibly the
              Essex Records Office at Chelmsford.

              Clare

              Comment

              Working...
              X