I am becoming more and confused about DNA testing, the more I read about it :( -
For example, if someone knew who his/her own father was, but didn't know who the father's parents were, would there be much point in having the father tested ?
And would it be ethical to have him tested without his knowledge?
Sorry if these issues have been raised before - I am still confused! :o
No point in having a paternity type DNA test unless you have a "suspect" to also test. You would need two living sons of the possible grandfather, which MIGHT tell you if they likely had the same father and could definitely tell you that they didn't.
No, you cannot test someone without their knowledge and consent - this is techinically assault (in England). You would have to forge the consent papers.
Thanks OC - I think that's what I suspected - but asked the question because I wondered what the test could show about the person's ethnicity - there are possibilities that the person I was thinking about might have Carribean or Turkish/Armenian parents.
But as he would never consent to a test, it's all academic.
I don't think Ancestry do geographical DNA testing (deep ancestry, this type of test is called) but even if it did, a geographical test will only tell you where your relatives originated, more than 17,000 years ago, which won't be much help to you, lol!
(Oh, they can narrow it down to the last ten generations sometimes, but still not much use)
Comment