I know when she was born but am useless at guessing ages ... so any ideas please
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Another one for a date
Collapse
X
-
Another one for a date
Last edited by Rachel Scand; 13-09-09, 15:16.~ FOR PHOTO RESTORATIONS PLEASE SCAN AT A RESOLUTION OF 300-600 WITH THE SCALE AT 100% MINIMUM ~ http://restoreandcolour.brainwaving.co.ukTags: None
-
I would have said between 20 and 25 taken at some point in the late 1920s or early 1930s.
(I might be miles out though!)
Edit: her face doesn't appear to have any wrinkles, but I am not sure whether her hair is slightly grey in places? Annoying that we cannot see the ring finger.
Another edit: Actually, I might be tempted to go earlier with the date. The lace on the dress wouldn't have been as fashionable in the late 1920s as it was in the late 1910s.
... oh I give up.... where's Barbara and Don?
lolLast edited by Tom Tom; 18-06-08, 19:31.
Remembering: Cuthbert Gregory 1889 - 1916, George Arnold Connelly 1886 - 1917, Thomas Lowe Davenport 1890 - 1917, Roland Davenport Farmer 1885 - 1916, William Davenport Sheffield 1879 - 1915, Cuthbert Gregory 1918 - 1944
-
:D thanks Tom ... you sound just like me
What do you think of my new dress colour ?
I'm not sure about it but thought it would be more 'summery'
~ FOR PHOTO RESTORATIONS PLEASE SCAN AT A RESOLUTION OF 300-600 WITH THE SCALE AT 100% MINIMUM ~ http://restoreandcolour.brainwaving.co.uk
Comment
-
Was it darker before? It looks very professional either way.
So when was this lady born then?
Remembering: Cuthbert Gregory 1889 - 1916, George Arnold Connelly 1886 - 1917, Thomas Lowe Davenport 1890 - 1917, Roland Davenport Farmer 1885 - 1916, William Davenport Sheffield 1879 - 1915, Cuthbert Gregory 1918 - 1944
Comment
-
Originally posted by Tom Tom View Post
So when was this lady born then?
~ FOR PHOTO RESTORATIONS PLEASE SCAN AT A RESOLUTION OF 300-600 WITH THE SCALE AT 100% MINIMUM ~ http://restoreandcolour.brainwaving.co.uk
Comment
-
Thanks Joan and Brenda
So that's between 17 and 25 so far
Yikes ... didn't notice the time .... off to cook
will be back in a while
:D Brenmac, you mean it's not all wrinkly !
~ FOR PHOTO RESTORATIONS PLEASE SCAN AT A RESOLUTION OF 300-600 WITH THE SCALE AT 100% MINIMUM ~ http://restoreandcolour.brainwaving.co.uk
Comment
-
Thanks Barbara
She was born in Spring/Summer 1882 .... so I was wondering if it might have been a special birthday photo
~ FOR PHOTO RESTORATIONS PLEASE SCAN AT A RESOLUTION OF 300-600 WITH THE SCALE AT 100% MINIMUM ~ http://restoreandcolour.brainwaving.co.uk
Comment
-
Told you I was well out. lol
Are you thinking maybe 18 or 21?
Remembering: Cuthbert Gregory 1889 - 1916, George Arnold Connelly 1886 - 1917, Thomas Lowe Davenport 1890 - 1917, Roland Davenport Farmer 1885 - 1916, William Davenport Sheffield 1879 - 1915, Cuthbert Gregory 1918 - 1944
Comment
-
well I did wonder about those ages Tom
I suppose at that time it was still the rule that the hair went up at the age of 18 ... and she's not showing off a ring, so assume it's not an engagement pic. (just thinking aloud)
Have no idea when, where or if she married so far
~ FOR PHOTO RESTORATIONS PLEASE SCAN AT A RESOLUTION OF 300-600 WITH THE SCALE AT 100% MINIMUM ~ http://restoreandcolour.brainwaving.co.uk
Comment
-
Thank Barbara .... that will do very nicely feels good
~ FOR PHOTO RESTORATIONS PLEASE SCAN AT A RESOLUTION OF 300-600 WITH THE SCALE AT 100% MINIMUM ~ http://restoreandcolour.brainwaving.co.uk
Comment
-
I think about 18.
She doesn't look as confidant as an older girl might.
Her hand looks a bit awkward sitting like that.MaryMc
Londonderry - McCorkell
Bedfordshire - Hensman, Morris
Warwickshire - Docker
Leicestershire - Staples, Marsden
Comment
-
Thanks Mary .... maybe she was like me and had a dislike of being photographed
~ FOR PHOTO RESTORATIONS PLEASE SCAN AT A RESOLUTION OF 300-600 WITH THE SCALE AT 100% MINIMUM ~ http://restoreandcolour.brainwaving.co.uk
Comment
Comment