So, I would say it was after then. I would think it would be around about 1905; I have a photo of a wedding from 1908 and all the men have top hats (none of my other wedding photos do) and the woman has got gloves on as well (again, in some of my earlier weddings but not later ones).
Don't know if it is just me, or just the way the dress falls..... but could the bride be pregnant?
Remembering: Cuthbert Gregory 1889 - 1916, George Arnold Connelly 1886 - 1917, Thomas Lowe Davenport 1890 - 1917, Roland Davenport Farmer 1885 - 1916, William Davenport Sheffield 1879 - 1915, Cuthbert Gregory 1918 - 1944
There J H Avery (Technical Photographers) listed in the phone directories (Ancestry) but not at that address ... and 1909 looks like the earliest .... he's at Parkhurst Rd, Camden from that time
Nice picture, looking at the dress, and bearing in mind the definition is not good. The dress seems to have a pouter pigeon waist, this puts it pre 1910 as it went out of fashion then. If you were to say somewhere about 1902 to 1904 I wouldn't argue....;)
could be a little later because of his shoes,wonder why she has no flowers could it be because of the war 1914?my hubby has the same hair style never changed brenda xxx
Comment