thanks to the Old Bailey Proceedings!
James is the chap who isn't on any census, though I have found him in his children's baptisms and in Sun Fire Insurance papers.
Just discovered him in the Old Bailey Proceedings 1845 giving evidence in his son's trial for theft. (His son his husband's gt gt grandfather and I thought I found him in 1871 in Parkhurst, though couldn't find Parkhurst registers to confirm it is him.
In this instance he was found not guilty.
Yeah!
James is the chap who isn't on any census, though I have found him in his children's baptisms and in Sun Fire Insurance papers.
Just discovered him in the Old Bailey Proceedings 1845 giving evidence in his son's trial for theft. (His son his husband's gt gt grandfather and I thought I found him in 1871 in Parkhurst, though couldn't find Parkhurst registers to confirm it is him.
In this instance he was found not guilty.
Yeah!
Comment