A couple married in Q3 1909. They had a daughter in Q4 1911 but they also had a son who was the first born.
There are a three possibles;
#1 George Edward Q3 1909
#2 Harold Edward Q1 1910
#3 John Q2 1910
Dad was called Edward Charles, grandad was called George (the mothers' father was called Roades/Rhoades so nothing obvious there).
#1 is a bit close to the marriage but the names match well for a naming pattern
#2 is a good fit between the marriage and the second child,
#3 could have been named after a great grandfather but is 70+years after the death of said grt grandfather.
I wonder if i should order #1 and #2 with a ref check from the local office but specify the parents names.
There are a three possibles;
#1 George Edward Q3 1909
#2 Harold Edward Q1 1910
#3 John Q2 1910
Dad was called Edward Charles, grandad was called George (the mothers' father was called Roades/Rhoades so nothing obvious there).
#1 is a bit close to the marriage but the names match well for a naming pattern
#2 is a good fit between the marriage and the second child,
#3 could have been named after a great grandfather but is 70+years after the death of said grt grandfather.
I wonder if i should order #1 and #2 with a ref check from the local office but specify the parents names.
Comment