i have a bit of a puzzle...
Michael Willis's birth was registered second quarter of 1962 ( manchester), but his death is registered the first quarter of 1962 ( preston, which could come under manchester i suppose its all the same area).
is this possible that the mother only got round to registering the birth after the death? he is down as dying age 0 so either at birth or under 1 year old.
Michael Willis's birth was registered second quarter of 1962 ( manchester), but his death is registered the first quarter of 1962 ( preston, which could come under manchester i suppose its all the same area).
is this possible that the mother only got round to registering the birth after the death? he is down as dying age 0 so either at birth or under 1 year old.
Comment