Hello,
I have been trying all afternoon to unravel something I have not come across before.
I found an entry on the 1911 Census for my ancestor Sarah A.E. Grant. I discover she has married Charles Wilson, both of them are calling themselves Wilson-Grant, also their infant son. Scrolling across I see in a column "B.sub.due to parentage". I realise this could perhaps apply to Charles Wilson but why his wife and child. I found Sarah's marriage in the index and when I check out "Spouse" there are four people listed on that day but not Charles Wilson, only possibility is a person named Bernhard Hagu. I have tried to track Charles on previous census but not knowing his parentage cannot pinpoint any possibilities.
Any ideas please? Many thanks.
dreen22
I have been trying all afternoon to unravel something I have not come across before.
I found an entry on the 1911 Census for my ancestor Sarah A.E. Grant. I discover she has married Charles Wilson, both of them are calling themselves Wilson-Grant, also their infant son. Scrolling across I see in a column "B.sub.due to parentage". I realise this could perhaps apply to Charles Wilson but why his wife and child. I found Sarah's marriage in the index and when I check out "Spouse" there are four people listed on that day but not Charles Wilson, only possibility is a person named Bernhard Hagu. I have tried to track Charles on previous census but not knowing his parentage cannot pinpoint any possibilities.
Any ideas please? Many thanks.
dreen22
Comment