Hello everybody , not been on for an absolute age and here I go with the questions!
I downloaded a 30 day full trial of this software last night to see if I like it as I'm torn between upgrading from FTM 2006 to 2014 and changing completely to something else.
This software gets a lot of good reviews and is supposed to be a lot more versatile than FTM. I'm particularly interested in its claimed ability to split trees.
I uploaded the OH's tree into it from a GEDCOM 5.5 file that I made from my FTM 2006 file. I couldn't get it to import the FTM file directly although I thought from the menu options that I could. I must have missed something crucial?
Anyway, the file opened up fine but my God what a fearsome looking beast it is. I don't think I feel near confident enough to change over without attending a beginner's course and building a small tree from scratch.
What's folks' views on Family Historian? Should I persevere?
I've looked at the help files for 2 jobs;
a) How to change the displayed date to the way I like it eg. 3 March 1905 and not 3 Mar 1905. I found an "interpreted as" option but all that did was leave the original format in place and followed it with my preferred format in inverted commas. The date now displayed as 3 Mar 1905 "3 March 1905". How do I get only the version I want?
b) Splitting a tree - I didn't understand the instructions at all. Perhaps I was too tired to take it in. I have quite a few persons who are siblings of a "married in" and I have recorded their spouses and issue as well. I also include parents of married ins. Perhaps I have been too wide in my additions but there are plenty instances in all my lines where cousins have married and I also have 4 lots of siblings marrying siblings. In the early days of my research I took note of everybody I could find in incoming families in case they provided clues as witnesses and informants etc. or as links for other researchers to match up with. I've just kept on doing it. My question is Does FH's splitting facility allow me to include all such persons?
I downloaded a 30 day full trial of this software last night to see if I like it as I'm torn between upgrading from FTM 2006 to 2014 and changing completely to something else.
This software gets a lot of good reviews and is supposed to be a lot more versatile than FTM. I'm particularly interested in its claimed ability to split trees.
I uploaded the OH's tree into it from a GEDCOM 5.5 file that I made from my FTM 2006 file. I couldn't get it to import the FTM file directly although I thought from the menu options that I could. I must have missed something crucial?
Anyway, the file opened up fine but my God what a fearsome looking beast it is. I don't think I feel near confident enough to change over without attending a beginner's course and building a small tree from scratch.
What's folks' views on Family Historian? Should I persevere?
I've looked at the help files for 2 jobs;
a) How to change the displayed date to the way I like it eg. 3 March 1905 and not 3 Mar 1905. I found an "interpreted as" option but all that did was leave the original format in place and followed it with my preferred format in inverted commas. The date now displayed as 3 Mar 1905 "3 March 1905". How do I get only the version I want?
b) Splitting a tree - I didn't understand the instructions at all. Perhaps I was too tired to take it in. I have quite a few persons who are siblings of a "married in" and I have recorded their spouses and issue as well. I also include parents of married ins. Perhaps I have been too wide in my additions but there are plenty instances in all my lines where cousins have married and I also have 4 lots of siblings marrying siblings. In the early days of my research I took note of everybody I could find in incoming families in case they provided clues as witnesses and informants etc. or as links for other researchers to match up with. I've just kept on doing it. My question is Does FH's splitting facility allow me to include all such persons?
Comment