PDA

View Full Version : can anyone spot Sarah please...



Darksecretz
05-03-13, 17:07
I have Sarah Holmes b. 1842 Whitwick, Leicestershire in all census bar 1891.

I believe she married William HUNT in 1864 ADLZ district,

in 1871 she is in Wales, Yorkshire with William.
http://search.ancestry.co.uk/cgi-bin/sse.dll?rank=1&new=1&MSAV=1&msT=1&gss=angs-g&gsfn=sar**&gsln=hunt&msbdy=1842&msbpn__ftp=Whitwick%2c+Leicestershire%2c+England&msbpn=85179&msbpn_PInfo=8-%7c0%7c0%7c3257%7c3251%7c0%7c0%7c0%7c5272%7c85179% 7c0%7c&msrpn__ftp=Nottinghamshire%2c+England&msrpn=5279&msrpn_PInfo=7-%7c0%7c0%7c3257%7c3251%7c0%7c0%7c0%7c5279%7c0%7c0% 7c&cpxt=1&catBucket=rstp&uidh=lg3&msbdp=2&cp=0&pcat=ROOT_CATEGORY&h=3335801&db=uki1871&indiv=1
Class: RG10; Piece: 3462; Folio: 108; Page: 8; GSU roll: 839422


1881: in Nottingham Radford
http://search.ancestry.co.uk/cgi-bin/sse.dll?rank=1&new=1&MSAV=1&msT=1&gss=angs-g&gsfn=sar**&gsln=hunt&msbdy=1842&msbpn__ftp=Whitwick%2c+Leicestershire%2c+England&msbpn=85179&msbpn_PInfo=8-%7c0%7c0%7c3257%7c3251%7c0%7c0%7c0%7c5272%7c85179% 7c0%7c&msrpn__ftp=Nottinghamshire%2c+England&msrpn=5279&msrpn_PInfo=7-%7c0%7c0%7c3257%7c3251%7c0%7c0%7c0%7c5279%7c0%7c0% 7c&cpxt=1&catBucket=rstp&uidh=lg3&msbdp=2&cp=0&pcat=ROOT_CATEGORY&h=17643312&db=uki1881&indiv=1
Class: RG11; Piece: 3344; Folio: 29; Page: 3; GSU roll: 1341798.


1901: New Radford, Nottingham
http://search.ancestry.co.uk/cgi-bin/sse.dll?rank=1&new=1&MSAV=1&msT=1&gss=angs-g&gsfn=sar**&gsln=hunt&msbdy=1842&msbpn__ftp=Whitwick%2c+Leicestershire%2c+England&msbpn=85179&msbpn_PInfo=8-%7c0%7c0%7c3257%7c3251%7c0%7c0%7c0%7c5272%7c85179% 7c0%7c&cpxt=1&catBucket=rstp&uidh=lg3&msbdp=2&cp=0&pcat=ROOT_CATEGORY&h=18692262&db=uki1901&indiv=1
1901 England Census, Class: RG13; Piece: 3181; Folio: 86; Page: 36.


1911: New Basford, Nottingham.
http://search.ancestry.co.uk/cgi-bin/sse.dll?db=1911England&indiv=try&h=5475760
Source Citation
Class: RG14; Piece: 20647
Description
Enumeration District: 14

if anyone can spot her in 1891 I would be really grateful thank you.

Janet in Yorkshire
05-03-13, 17:46
Not having any luck searching for either Sarah or William, Julie, sorry.

Jay

Darksecretz
05-03-13, 17:52
Not having any luck searching for either Sarah or William, Julie, sorry.

Jay

:( I know, they really seem to be elusive! boo hoo

AlanC
05-03-13, 18:49
Likewise I'm afraid Julie...............probably the fault of one of those transcribers! Try writing 'Hunt' and see what it could look like. I tried, Hart, Hurt, Hurst to no avail.

Darksecretz
05-03-13, 18:55
Likewise I'm afraid Julie...............probably the fault of one of those transcribers! Try writing 'Hunt' and see what it could look like. I tried, Hart, Hurt, Hurst to no avail.

mmm they sure are slippery.. I would expect them to be in/around Radford though, but I know that census is one night over 10yrs they could be anywhere, visiting relatives etc.. I don't think that they are with the Holmes' as I have those through the census and nothing seemed to flag up..

Elaine ..Spain
05-03-13, 19:06
Same as the others Julie, can't find them.

Darksecretz
05-03-13, 19:32
Same as the others Julie, can't find them.

I do appreciate you all looking, I have been trying all sorts of tricks to attempt to find them but nothing..

AlanC
05-03-13, 19:41
Finally Julie, they were'nt at our place for tea:)

Darksecretz
05-03-13, 21:14
Finally Julie, they were'nt at our place for tea:)

hahahaha!! :p

Darksecretz
05-03-13, 21:31
Bloomsgrove Street, on the 1901 census is just off Ilkeston Road, Radford [from the 1881 Census] so you would think that they would not be far away. I am going to see if I can find these Roads in 1891 and see if I can spot anything.

Nottinghamshire > Radford > District 4 >checked not there.
Nottinghamshire > Radford > District 5 >checked not there
Nottinghamshire > Radford > District 6 >> checked
Nottinghamshire > Radford > District 7 >> checked
Nottinghamshire > Radford > District 8>>checked
Nottinghamshire > Radford > District 9 >>checked
Nottinghamshire > Radford > District 10 >>checked
dist 11>>>checked
dist 12 >>>checked
dist 13>>checked
14 checked
15 checked
16 checked
17 checked
18 checked
19 checked
2 checked
20 checked
21 checked
22 checked
23 checked
24 checked
25 checked
26 checked
27 checked
28 checked
29 checked
3 checked
30 checked
31 checked
32 checked
33 checked
34 checked
1 checked

Chrissie Smiff
05-03-13, 22:06
Sorry Julie, not a sausage I'm afraid.

Darksecretz
05-03-13, 22:13
Sorry Julie, not a sausage I'm afraid.

it's ok Chris, am trawling the 1891 in that area at the moment, the enumerator [or whoever copied his writing has made a right old pigs ear of it!]

Chrissie Smiff
05-03-13, 22:32
I've put a correction in 1911 for Sarah's birthplace too Julie :D

Darksecretz
05-03-13, 22:43
I've put a correction in 1911 for Sarah's birthplace too Julie :D

ok ta Chris... i'll have more correction emails than a little!!!

annswabey
05-03-13, 23:14
My GreatGrandparents were in Radford at that time, too, and they were very difficult to find!

Val wish Id never started
05-03-13, 23:56
I tried too Julie but found nothing .

Janet in Yorkshire
06-03-13, 08:36
Isn't it frustrating when they won't come out to play?
We could do with an ongoing "missing" database, so that we could keep on searching for specific individuals whenever we had a little time to spare!

Jay

Darksecretz
06-03-13, 09:15
My GreatGrandparents were in Radford at that time, too, and they were very difficult to find!

The census returns for this area are shocking Ann, the writing by one particular enumerator was that bad that I was correcting possibly 5 families from each page!!..


I tried too Julie but found nothing

Appreciate it Val :)


Isn't it frustrating when they won't come out to play?
We could do with an ongoing "missing" database, so that we could keep on searching for specific individuals whenever we had a little time to spare!

Jay

now THAT is a good idea Jay!

Chrissie Smiff
06-03-13, 11:41
ok ta Chris... i'll have more correction emails than a little!!!

I know what you mean Julie:) I got another one yesterday with a thank you and a list of all the ones I'd done recently.
It's very nice that Ancestry thank you but do you get contacted now and then by descendants asking if you are related? I've had one or two and one seemed quite put out that I had corrected it but wasn't related. Even though he admitted that it had helped him to find the record :confused:

Darksecretz
06-03-13, 14:10
I know what you mean Julie:) I got another one yesterday with a thank you and a list of all the ones I'd done recently.
It's very nice that Ancestry thank you but do you get contacted now and then by descendants asking if you are related? I've had one or two and one seemed quite put out that I had corrected it but wasn't related. Even though he admitted that it had helped him to find the record :confused:

yep I know what you mean, I have now taken to adding to the bit at the bottom [extra info] that this person is not connected to me, I am just correcting the name!

but, hopefully, the amount of corrections WILL help some poor soul that is looking for their relatives in Nottingham.

Darksecretz
11-03-13, 12:24
well, I have trawled the entire set for 1891 Radford and I cannot spot them.. I guess that they don't want to be found at the moment then!!