Please I am trying to find the death of a William Lofthouse born in the 1850's.He was married to Mary Ann Lofthouse march qrt 1875 at Barton upon Irwell Lancashire.In the 1881 census she boarding with her son James 2 he was born 1879 and they were with her parents Robert and Sarah Ann Menzie at 112 Bridgewater st Mary Ann Lofthouse went on to Marry Thomas Baxendale.Cannot find anything thing else on William Lofthouse hit a brick wall on this one.Could someone please help out. Thanks Dorcus
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Fresh pair of eyes please
Collapse
X
-
Well between 1881 and 1887 the most likely in Lancashire would be Sept 1883 in Lancaster aged 33. The other possibilities are all in Yorkshire. Do we know exactly when/where in the 1850's he was born?Last edited by Chrissie Smiff; 15-01-13, 09:46.Chrissie passed away in January 2020.
Comment
-
Hi all I am not sure when he was born.On the 1881 census William is living with mary lofthouse 60 ann Pollitt 40 its says William is 26 and married there is also his siblings there too.It looks like he was born about 1855.Thanks Dorcus
Comment
-
Hi all I am not sure when he was born.On the 1881 census William is living with mary lofthouse 60 ann Pollitt 40 its says William is 26 and married there is also his siblings there too.It looks like he was born about 1855.Thanks Dorcus.The 1881 census says Barton upon irwell
Comment
-
Originally posted by Chrissie Smiff View PostDid people get divorced in those days?
After the Divorce and Matrimonial Causes Act of 1857 divorce did become available, on the sole ground of Adultery (for a man to divorce his wife...for a woman to divorce her husband she had to prove adultery AND an additional aggravating factor). Numbers of divorces were low, and if it did take place, it would expensive and not realistic for most people. There were a few hundred a year up until the law changed again in 1937.
If she had been deserted by her husband she may have felt free to remarry .... there was a legal presumption, developed about this time, that where "a spouse had not been heard of for 7 years , by those who could be expected to have heard from them, and inquiries had not discovered their whereabouts", it could be presumed that they had died, leaving a spouse free to remarry.
Did Mary Ann claim to be a widow at the time of her 2nd marriage in 1887 ?Last edited by AntonyM; 15-01-13, 15:24.Retired professional researcher, and ex- deputy registrar, now based in Worcestershire. Happy to give any help or advice I can ( especially on matters of civil registration) - contact via PM or my website www.chalfontresearch.co.uk
Follow me on Twittter @ChalfontR
Comment
-
if you haven't got it then you will need to buy the marriage cert in 1875 William>Mary Ann, this will then possibly [more than likely] give you Williams fathers name and occupation, also the witness' names might also hold clues to family members [as yet unknown.] not sure you can realistically track William without further info if I am honest!.
it will also give you Williams occupation too [trying to think on the wing and cook at the same time!]Julie
They're coming to take me away haha hee hee..........
.......I find dead people
Comment
-
Hi William 20 1855 married mary ann menzie 20 1st jan 1875 at Christ church patricroft -grooms father was James Lofthouse Then in 1887 mary ann it says Lofthouse married Thomas Baxendale at Wigan Register Office.I was wondering they may have been divorced as you were not allowed to marry in church unless your husband died (was that right). Dorcus
Comment
-
Originally posted by AntonyM View PostDid Mary Ann claim to be a widow at the time of her 2nd marriage in 1887 ?Originally posted by dorcus View PostHi Antony I don't know the answer to that question.All I have is the birth certificate of Mary ann Lofthouse nee Menzie,perhaps it may be one of the reasons you quoted as above. Thanks DorcusOriginally posted by dorcus View PostHi William 20 1855 married mary ann menzie 20 1st jan 1875 at Christ church patricroft -grooms father was James Lofthouse Then in 1887 mary ann it says Lofthouse married Thomas Baxendale at Wigan Register Office.I was wondering they may have been divorced as you were not allowed to marry in church unless your husband died (was that right). Dorcus
I'm confused. If you know Mary Ann's 1887 marriage was at Wigan Register Office does this mean you have access to the register entry? In which case surely you can see if she claimed to be a widow?Judith passed away in October 2018
Comment
-
Judith,
I think perhaps Dorcus has found the second marriage on Lancs BMD. However it COULD have been EITHER at the registry office, OR with the registrar in attendance (non-C of E) I don't think you can say categorically it's one or the other without getting the cert or finding the speciific location cited in some other primary source????
JayJanet in Yorkshire
Genealogists never die - they just swap places in the family tree
Comment
-
Ahh, I'd forgotten about LancBMD. No help there then, but in any case even if it does say widow on the marriage entry that wouldn't mean William was definitely dead. Could be that she presumed he was dead or that they had separated and she decided to pass herself off as widow rather than try for the extremely difficult and expensive divorce route. I guess the best bet is to track each William Lofthouse through the censuses and try to match them with any deaths.Judith passed away in October 2018
Comment
-
As stated in post 15, the Lancs BMD site doesn't state for definite that Thomas and Mary married in the registry office; it could have been in a church or chapel with the registrar attending.
I know certs are expensive, but I think this one would be a worthwhile investment because
a) it will give you the definite venue
b) it will tell you the marital status Mary claimed
c) ditto for Thomas
(If I've found the right couple in 1891 census, there is a Sarah Baxendale born Wigan c 1885/6. There are 2 possible birth registrations - Mar 1885 & Dec 1886.)
JayJanet in Yorkshire
Genealogists never die - they just swap places in the family tree
Comment
-
Mary AND tHOMAS did have children sarah, ellen,and martha.Mary and william had james lofthouse and Jane nora lofthouse.i sent for the marrage certificat for jane nora and where it said the fathers name it was not william lofthouse but Thomas Baxendale.I will sent for the certificate Janet.Searching family trees is an eye opener indeed. What puzzled me is when they registered jane noras birth why didnt they put her as baxendale. Dorcus
Comment
Comment