yep, totally agree... I wonder how Peter 'knows' for definite that Robert had brothers Joseph & Albert. [not meaning to be rude or anything, just seems odd that there are brothers and nothing more is known.]
it might be worthwhile Peter sending for his Grandfathers Service Records, [if they survived!] I know it's expensive, but it may just give that little snippit that is needed to get the ball rolling!...
I have found another family also with children Joseph/Albert and ROSEHANNAH in 1891: though the fathers name is John Robert! [though it isn't unknown for children that have lost parents at an early age to get their parents names totally wrong!]
anyhow to throw this into the pot to prove/disprove
1891: http://search.ancestry.co.uk/cgi-bin...iv=1&ml_rpos=2
Source Citation: Class: RG12; Piece: 2297; Folio: 140; Page: 21; GSU Roll: 6097407.
it might be worthwhile Peter sending for his Grandfathers Service Records, [if they survived!] I know it's expensive, but it may just give that little snippit that is needed to get the ball rolling!...
I have found another family also with children Joseph/Albert and ROSEHANNAH in 1891: though the fathers name is John Robert! [though it isn't unknown for children that have lost parents at an early age to get their parents names totally wrong!]
anyhow to throw this into the pot to prove/disprove
1891: http://search.ancestry.co.uk/cgi-bin...iv=1&ml_rpos=2
Source Citation: Class: RG12; Piece: 2297; Folio: 140; Page: 21; GSU Roll: 6097407.
Comment